COGNITIVE DISSONANCE AND NONVERBAL SEMIOSIS: SHAPING SECONDARY LINGUISTIC PERSONALITY IN CHINESE LEARNERS OF RUSSIAN THROUGH VISUAL REFLECTION

Viktoriia S. Abramova

doi:10.29121/shodhgyan.v4.i2.2026.151

Authors

Dr. Viktoriia S. Abramova PHD in Philology, Associate Professor, Faculty of Philology, MSU-BIT University, Shenzhen, China, Associate Professor, Department of Languages for Specific Purposes, Associate Professor, Department of Pedagogy and Language Didactics, Perm State National Research University, Perm, Russia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29121/shodhgyan.v4.i2.2026.151

Keywords:

Secondary Linguistic Personality, Nonverbal Communication, Interiorization, Cognitive Dissonance, Visual Reflection, Chinese Learners of Russian, Intercultural Empathy

Abstract [English]

This study examines the internalisation of nonverbal code as a constitutive element of secondary linguistic personality (SLP) among Chinese learners of Russian. Although up to 80% of social meaning is conveyed non-verbally, the impact of nonverbal communication on deep personal transformation in language learners remains underexplored. To address this gap, the study focuses on overcoming cognitive dissonance arising from clashes between Russian and Chinese nonverbal systems, and its role in developing cultural empathy and hybrid identity. The study's originality lies in three areas: theoretical (integrating SLP, internalisation, semiotics, and the four-dimensional model of language personality), methodological (using visual data as a metacognitive tool through visual languaging), and empirical (focusing on the bicultural context of MSU-BIT University in Shenzhen, China). Data from 24 Chinese Master's students included reflective presentations on "How learning Russian is shaping me," project reports, and field observations. The methodology integrated qualitative and quantitative content analysis. The findings show a three-stage dynamic: primary cognitive dissonance with stereotypical interpretations; awareness of cultural conditionality through reflection; and formation of hybrid practices, with over 83% of respondents reporting changed self-perception when using Russian, evident in new gestural patterns and cultural empathy. The study concludes that nonverbal code operates as an active mechanism of personal transformation, and visual reflection triggers metacognitive processes that help overcome ethnocentrism.

References

Abramova, V. S., and Zhang, S. (2025). Mezhkul'Turnoe Vospitanie Molodëzhi v Obrazovatel'nom Processe Sovmestnogo Rossijsko-Kitajskogo Universiteta Msu-Bit v Shen'chzhjene [Intercultural Education of Youth in the Educational Process of the Joint Russian-Chinese University MSU-BIT in Shenzhen]. In Vospitanie Detej I Molodëzhi V Otkrytom Obrazovatel'Nom Prostranstve ( 56–64). Perm State University.

Bondarenko, E. N. (2023). Reflection of the Professional Attitudes of a Firefighter's Linguistic Personality in the Image of a Firefighter in the Children's Tale "The Cheerful Firefighter" by I. V. Zartayskaya. Philological Sciences, 16(10), 3257–3263. https://doi.org/10.30853/phil20230506 DOI: https://doi.org/10.30853/phil20230506

Burgoon, J. K., Manusov, V., and Guerrero, L. K. (2022). Nonverbal Communication (2nd ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003095552 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003095552

Chen, D. (2023). Exploring the Alignment of Visual Languaging With a Pluriliteracies Model for Deeper Learning in English Language Classrooms. English Teaching and Learning, 47, 359–383. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42321-023-00152-x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42321-023-00152-x

Daszkiewicz, M. (2019). Language Personality as a Four-Dimensional Construct Falling Outside University Students' Reflection. Philological Sciences, 2, 21–29. https://doi.org/10.20339/PhS.2-19.021 DOI: https://doi.org/10.20339/PhS.2-19.021

Fang, C., and Abramova, V. S. (2025). Sovmestnyj Rossijsko-Kitajskij Universitet MSU-BIT v Shen'Chzhjene Kak Platforma Dlya Mezhkul'turnyh Kommunikacij [The Joint Russian-Chinese University MSU-BIT in Shenzhen as a Platform for Intercultural Communications]. In Vospitanie detej i Molodëzhi V Otkrytom Obrazovatel'Nom Prostranstve (147–154). Perm State University.

Fasolya, A. A. (2019). Genesis of the Concept of "Interiorization" in Psychological and Pedagogical Science. Human Capital, 6(126), 115–119. https://doi.org/10.25629/HC.2019.06.13 DOI: https://doi.org/10.25629/HC.2019.06.13

Festinger, L. (1957). A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance. Stanford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781503620766 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9781503620766

Galperin, P. Y. (1992). The Problem of Activity in Soviet Psychology. Journal of Russian and East European Psychology, 30(4), 37–59. https://doi.org/10.2753/RPO1061-0405300437 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2753/RPO1061-0405300437

Hall, E. T. (1959). The Silent Language. Doubleday.

Karaulov, Y. N. (1987). Russkij Yazyk I Yazykovaya Lichnost' [Russian Language and Linguistic Personality]. Nauka.

Karaulov, Y. N. (1989). Russkaya Yazykovaya Lichnost' I Zadachi Ee Izucheniya [Russian Linguistic Personality and the tasks of its study]. In Language and personality (3–8). Nauka.

Khaleyeva, I. I. (1989). Osnovy Teorii Obucheniya Ponimaniyu Inoyazychnoj Rechi [Foundations of the Theory of Teaching Understanding of Foreign Language Speech]. Vysshaya Shkola.

Khaleyeva, I. I. (1995). Vtorichnaya Yazykovaya Lichnost' Kak Retsipient Inofonnogo Teksta [Secondary Linguistic Personality as a Recipient of Foreign-Language Text]. In Yazyk – Sistema. Yazyk – Tekst. Yazyk – Sposobnost' ( 277–286). RAN IRYA.

Mehrabian, A. (1972). Nonverbal Communication. Aldine-Atherton.

Oleinik, M. A., and Spiridonova, O. S. (2019). Vtorichnaya Yazykovaya Lichnost' i Mediator Kul'tury: K Voprosu o Terminakh I Ikh Soderzhanii [Secondary Linguistic Personality and Cultural Mediator: On the Question of Terms and Their Content]. Filologicheskie Nauki. Voprosy Teorii i Praktiki, 12(1), 58–61.

Paivio, A. (1991). Dual Coding Theory and Education. Educational Psychology Review, 3(3), 149–210. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01320076 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01320076

Richards, J. C., and Lockhart, C. (1996). Reflective Teaching in Second Language Classrooms. Cambridge University Press.

Ruzhentseva, N. B., and Zhang, Y. (2016). Specifika Kommunikativnogo Povedeniya Kitajcev: Vospriyatie Nositelyami Rossijskoj Lingvokul'tury [The Specifics of Chinese Communicative Behavior: Perception by Russian Linguistic Culture Bearers]. Pedagogicheskoe Obrazovanie v Rossii, 11, 89–95. https://doi.org/10.26170/po16-11-15 DOI: https://doi.org/10.26170/po16-11-15

Tarnopolsky, O., Kozhushko, S., Kliuchnyk, R., and Storozhuk, S. (2021). Secondary Language Personality and Principled Pragmatism in Developing that Personality in Foreign Language Education at Tertiary Linguistic Schools. Cogent Education, 8(1), Article 1898736. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2021.1898736 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2021.1898736

Usmanova, M. I. (2024). About the Role of Linguistic Personality in Cross-Cultural Society. Web of Scientist: International Scientific Research Journal, 5(6).

Vardzelashvili, J. A., and Prokofyeva, L. P. (2022). The Formation of a Secondary Linguistic Personality in the Space of a Foreign Language. Philological Class, 27(4), 205–216.

Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes. Harvard University Press.