RE-READING T. S. ELIOT’S THE WASTE LAND THROUGH INDIAN KNOWLEDGE SYSTEMS: UPANISHADIC THOUGHT AND THE QUEST FOR SPIRITUAL RENEWAL
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29121/shodhgyan.v3.i1.2025.129Keywords:
T. S. Eliot, The Waste Land, Indian Knowledge Systems, Upanishads, Comparative Philosophy, Modernism, Spiritual Renewal, Decolonial Reading, Mandukya Upanishad, Cross-Cultural HermeneuticsAbstract [English]
This paper aims at a critical re-reading of T. S. Eliot's The Waste Land (1922) with the intent of analyzing the philosophical theories which underlie it in the context of Indian Knowledge Systems (IKS), specifically the Upanishads, Bhagavad Gita and other dharmic systems. Eastern thought has been recognized as Eliot's preoccupation in the scholarship that already exists, but most studies have considered his reliance on Indian materials as ornamental or exoticist. This review suggests that, far from being ornamental, the Upanishadic residue of The Waste Land is essential: that the poem's philosophical construction, its epistemological fears, its soteriological hopes are all in some way determined by Indian philosophy. The present paper focuses on the contributions of recent scholars working on comparative philosophy, postcolonialism and the framework of the National Education Policy (NEP 2020) in introducing concepts such as brahman-Atman identity, maya, doctrine of detachment (vairagya) and theory of consciousness in the Mandukya Upanishad that facilitate the understanding of the structure and meaning of the poem.
References
Alexander, M. (1987). T. S. Eliot and the Upanishads. In K. V. Dominic (Ed.), Indian Poetry in English: Critical Essays ( 45–62). Poetry Society of India.
Chakrabarti, A. (2022). Consciousness and the Self in Indian Philosophy. Philosophy East and West, 72(3), 678–695.
Deussen, P. (1966). The Philosophy of the Upanishads (A. S. Geden, Trans.). Dover Publications. (Original Work Published 1906)
Dharwadker, V. (2019). Indian Modernisms and the Transnational Literary Field. Comparative Literature Studies, 56(2), 301–325.
Eliot, T. S. (1971). The Waste Land: A Facsimile and Transcript of the Original Drafts (V. Eliot, Ed.). Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
Eliot, T. S. (2001). The Waste Land: An Authoritative Text, Contexts, Criticism (M. North, Ed.). W. W. Norton.
Fradkin, R. (2020). Eliot, Vedanta, and the Philosophy of F. H. Bradley. Journal of Modern Literature, 43(2), 112–130.
Gupta, S. (2021). Indian Knowledge Systems and Higher Education. Indian Journal of Higher Education, 18(4), 55–72.
Kulkarni, A. R. (2023). Vedantic Epistemology and Modernist Poetry. Comparative Literature Studies, 60(1), 89–110.
Ministry of Education. (2020). National Education Policy 2020. Government of India.
Mohanty, J. N. (2021). Indian Philosophy and the Contemporary Debate on Consciousness. In S. R. R. Naidu (Ed.), Philosophy of mind: Indian and Western Perspectives ( 112–135). Motilal Banarsidass.
Nadkarni, A. (2020). T. S. Eliot and Transnational Modernism. In A. J. M. Smith (Ed.), The Cambridge Companion to T. S. Eliot ( 178–195). Cambridge University Press.
Nerlekar, A. (2018). Bombay Modern: Arun Kolatkar and Bilingual Literary Culture. Northwestern University Press.
Radhakrishnan, S. (1923). Indian Philosophy (Vol. 1). George Allen and Unwin.
Rainey, L. (2005). Revisiting The Waste Land. Yale University Press.
Said, E. W. (1978). Orientalism. Pantheon Books.
Smith, G. (1974). T. S. Eliot's Poetry and Plays: A Study in Sources and Influences. University of Chicago Press.
Spengemann, B. C. (2021). The Upanishads and Modernist Literature. Modernism/Modernity, 28(3), 445–467.
Vivekananda, S. (1994). The Complete Works of Swami Vivekananda. Advaita Ashrama.
Warren, K. (2022). Decolonizing Literary Criticism. Journal of Postcolonial Writing, 58(4), 512–528.
Watts, C. (2019). Eliot and the East: Reconsidering the Upanishadic Subtext. Literature and Theology, 33(1), 78–94.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Deepak

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
With the licence CC-BY, authors retain the copyright, allowing anyone to download, reuse, re-print, modify, distribute, and/or copy their contribution. The work must be properly attributed to its author.
It is not necessary to ask for further permission from the author or journal board.
This journal provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge.



















